Scientists have accepted natural selection as a driver of evolution for more than 160 years, thanks to Charles Darwin.
But University of Cincinnati biologist Michal Polak says Darwin’s book “The Descent of Man” only tells part of the story. Sometimes when the victor vanquishes his sexual rival, the quest to pass genes to the next generation is just beginning.
According to a new UC study published in the journal Current Biology, male fruit flies with the most impressive sexual ornamentation also have super sperm that can outcompete that of rivals in the post-mating fertilization game.
UC studied Drosophila bipectinata, a tiny red-eyed fruit fly from the South Pacific. The male’s forelegs have a distinctive “sex comb,” dark bristles that female fruit flies find appealing—like the colorful train of a male peacock. Scientists previously found that female flies prefer males with more robust sex combs, which the males use to grasp the female’s abdomen before mating.
UC researchers found a strong link between the most impressive sex combs and that male’s competitive success at passing on his genes even after a female fly has mated with other flies. And this competitive edge persisted even after the male’s sex comb was surgically removed with a high-precision laser in UC experiments.
“This is the first robust demonstration of a genetic link between a traditionally Darwinian trait and success in postcopulatory sexual competition,” Polak said. “That’s the surprising link: precopulatory and postcopulatory fitness.”
In his groundbreaking 1859 book “On the Origin of Species,” Darwin framed the idea of natural selection by describing how the “fittest” animals pass on their genes to the next generation. This fitness is manifested in having the largest antlers, the most vibrant colors or the vigor to defend a territory.
But Darwin’s theory was incomplete, Polak said, because it failed to recognize that sexual selection continues during and after mating. Female fruit flies are promiscuous, often choosing multiple mates. Fruit flies are hardly alone in that regard, Polak said.
“Promiscuity is much more common across animal species than once was thought,” Polak said.
Scientists living in prim and proper Victorian England did not give enough consideration to the microscopic race to fertilize that begins after mating among multiple successful suitors.
“You have to consider the social context in which Darwin was living,” Polak said.
What females gain from mating with multiple suitors is not always clear, Polak said. But when they do, postcopulatory sexual selection provides a competitive edge.
“It’s evident even in primates. Female chimpanzees and bonobos are promiscuous, so the males have large testes that produce big volumes of sperm,” Polak said.
“And you have species like gorillas where females are not promiscuous. Silverback males enforce monogamy. And lo and be hold, their testes are much smaller relative to body size compared to chimps.”
And if you’re wondering, the relative size of human testes falls somewhere between gorillas and chimps, Polak said.
Polak, a professor of biology in UC’s College of Arts and Sciences, decided to study this species of fruit fly after encountering it while conducting fieldwork in Queensland, Australia.
“I was watching these flies mate on a fruit and looked under the microscope and saw these beautiful sex combs. I thought it would make a good model system to study,” Polak said.
“Sexual selection picks up on these traits and they become really exaggerated,” he said.
UC researchers found a link between a fruit fly’s sexual ornamentation and its success over rivals in fertilizing eggs. Pictured are UC graduate Kassie Hooker, left, and UC biologists Joshua Benoit and Michal Polak. Credit: Andrew Higley/UC Creative
For their study, UC biologists artificially selected males with the largest and smallest sex combs in 11 successive generations of fruit flies to create high and low genetic lines.
Kassie Hooker from 2012 to 2015 worked in Polak’s lab as an undergraduate biology student, undertaking the arduous task of categorizing generations of male fruit flies based on the size of the sex combs on their legs. By counting the teeth in each comb, she separated the males with the largest and smallest sex combs to create distinct genetic lines.
To show that the male fruit fly’s sex comb doesn’t provide any reproductive benefit in mating, researchers used ultraprecise lasers to trim the sex comb in the high line males to mimic those found in the low line males. But these postsurgical males continued to fertilize more eggs even when females mated with lower-line males first.
The research was supported by the National Science Foundation.
UC assistant professor Joshua Benoit, a study co-author, analyzed the RNA of the flies and identified seminal fluid genes that may be responsible for giving high-line males a fertilization advantage.
“There aren’t many studies more interesting than this one,” Benoit said. “Sex, lasers, and male competition, which could describe most 1980s action movies.”
Darwin proposed the theory of sexual selection to account for the evolution of male weaponry and extravagant ornamental displays, Polak said. But UC’s study found a far more complex and interesting battle among the sexes.
“We established a link between Darwinian traits and the postcopulatory arena, which Darwin didn’t recognize was important in evolution at all,” Polak said.
Michal Polak et al, Positive genetic covariance between male sexual ornamentation and fertilizing capacity, Current Biology (2021). DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.01.046
‘Sex, lasers and male competition:’ fruit flies win genetic race with rivals (2021, February 12)
retrieved 13 February 2021
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.